From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avery v. Ackart

County Court, Onondaga County
Jun 1, 1897
20 Misc. 631 (N.Y. Cnty. Ct. 1897)

Opinion

June, 1897.

Frank Sargent, for motion.

D.B. Magee, opposed.


Upon obtaining satisfaction of the judgment there is nothing upon which these proceedings can rest. The judgment debtor simply did what he had a legal right to do, obtained a satisfaction of the judgment against him and thereupon these proceedings so far as the judgment debtor is concerned necessarily terminated. They were instituted for the purpose of collecting the judgment and all the rights of the judgment creditor incidental to such a proceeding were for the purpose of aiding in the accomplishment of such collection and when the judgment is satisfied that is the end of the matter. Whether the bill of sale was executed before the delivery of the satisfaction of the judgment I deem of no importance for the judgment debtor has obtained a satisfaction of the judgment which is no longer in existence. The motion to punish for contempt is denied, without costs. So far as setting aside the satisfaction and assignment is concerned, no order can be made without the presence in court of the assignee of the judgment creditor, the owner of the judgment, and I doubt whether the satisfaction can be set aside so far as the judgment debtor is concerned. I do not see what obligation to the judgment creditor or to the moving attorney he has violated. He has simply obtained a satisfaction of the judgment against him from the owner of the same, which he had a right to do.

Quaere, if the assignee of the judgment creditor had notice of the agreement between his assignor and the moving attorney herein whether he cannot be compelled to carry out the agreement of the judgment creditor? In other words, if he made the purchase for the purpose of depriving the attorney for the judgment creditor of the benefit of the agreement entered into between him and his client is he not liable to carry out such an agreement? The motion to set aside the satisfaction and assignment denied for the reasons stated but without prejudice to a renewal.

Motion denied, but without prejudice to a renewal.


Summaries of

Avery v. Ackart

County Court, Onondaga County
Jun 1, 1897
20 Misc. 631 (N.Y. Cnty. Ct. 1897)
Case details for

Avery v. Ackart

Case Details

Full title:AUGUSTUS S. AVERY, Judgment Creditor, v . FRANK C. ACKART, Judgment Debtor

Court:County Court, Onondaga County

Date published: Jun 1, 1897

Citations

20 Misc. 631 (N.Y. Cnty. Ct. 1897)
46 N.Y.S. 1085

Citing Cases

ROOK v. DICKINSON

This case was decided by the City Court of New York. Opposed to this case is the case of Avery v. Ackart, 20…