From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Church v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 29, 2015
No. 68614 (Nev. App. Dec. 29, 2015)

Opinion

No. 68614

12-29-2015

AVERY ALLEN CHURCH, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; James M. Bixler, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument and we conclude the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g).

Appellant Avery Church filed his petition on March 17, 2015, six years after issuance of the remittitur on direct appeal on March 3, 2009. Church v. State, Docket No. 48741 (Order of Affirmance, February 3, 2009). Thus, Church's petition was untimely filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Moreover, Church's petition was an abuse of the writ as he raised claims new and different from those raised in his previous petition. See NRS 34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS 34.810(2). Church's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, Church was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2).

Church v. State, Docket No. 56402 (Order of Affirmance, October 5, 2011).

Relying in part on Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 1309 (2012), Church argued that ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel excused his procedural defects. Ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel would not be good cause in the instant case because the appointment of counsel in the prior postconviction proceedings was not statutorily or constitutionally required. Crump v. Warden, 113 Nev. 293, 303, 934 P.2d 247, 253 (1997); McKague v. Warden, 112 Nev. 159, 164, 912 P.2d 255, 258 (1996). Further, the Nevada Supreme Court has held that Martinez does not apply to Nevada's statutory postconviction procedures, see Brown v. McDaniel, 130 Nev. ___, ___, 331 P.3d 867, 871-72 (2014), and thus, Martinez does not provide good cause for this untimely petition. Church also failed to overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Church's motion to appoint counsel. See NRS 34.750(1). --------

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Silver cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge

Avery Allen Church, Jr.

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Church v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 29, 2015
No. 68614 (Nev. App. Dec. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Church v. State

Case Details

Full title:AVERY ALLEN CHURCH, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 29, 2015

Citations

No. 68614 (Nev. App. Dec. 29, 2015)

Citing Cases

Church v. State

See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). See Church v. State, Docket No. 68614 (Order of…