From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avendano v. Bostock

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 30, 2023
20-cv-700-JLR (W.D. Wash. May. 30, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-700-JLR

05-30-2023

Wilfredo FAVELA AVENDANO, et al., Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. Drew BOSTOCK, Director of the Seattle Field Office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et. al., Respondents-Defendants.

Matt Adams, WSBA No. 28287 Aaron Korthuis, WSBA No. 53974 Tim Henry Warden-Hertz LaRond Baker, WSBA No. 43610 NICHOLAS BROWN United States Attorney MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NY # 4666657 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Attorneys for Federal Respondents-Defendants Joan K. Mell III Branches Law, PLLC Attorney for Respondent-Defendant the Facility Administrator of the Northwest ICE Processing Center David C. Fathi, WSBA No. 24893** Eunice H. Cho, WSBA No. 53711 Omar C. Jadwat* My Khanh Ngo* Attorneys for Plaintiffs *Admitted pro hac vice **Not admitted in D.C.; practice limited to federal courts JAMES C. STRONG, WSBA # 59151 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office


Matt Adams, WSBA No. 28287

Aaron Korthuis, WSBA No. 53974

Tim Henry Warden-Hertz

LaRond Baker, WSBA No. 43610

NICHOLAS BROWN

United States Attorney

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NY # 4666657

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

Attorneys for Federal Respondents-Defendants

Joan K. Mell

III Branches Law, PLLC

Attorney for Respondent-Defendant the Facility Administrator of the Northwest ICE Processing Center

David C. Fathi, WSBA No. 24893**

Eunice H. Cho, WSBA No. 53711

Omar C. Jadwat*

My Khanh Ngo*

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

*Admitted pro hac vice

**Not admitted in D.C.; practice limited to federal courts

JAMES C. STRONG, WSBA # 59151

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

HONORABLE JAMES. L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Parties have filed a Stipulated Motion to Dismiss and Grant Final Approval of the class action settlement (Dkt. # 656). The Court has carefully considered the Class Settlement Agreement together with all exhibits thereto, all the filings related to the settlement, the arguments of counsel, and the record in this case. The Court also held a fairness hearing on May 30, 2023, following notice to the class as approved by the Court's previous order granting preliminary approval of the Agreement. The Court finds that the Agreement is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. This Case is dismissed with prejudice. The Parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs, except as provided by the Agreement.

2. The Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference in this Order, and all terms or phrases used in this Order shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement.

3. The Court grants final approval of the Agreement, finding that the terms of the Agreement are fair, reasonable, and adequate as required by Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23(e)(2).

4. The Court previously certified the class as “All individuals detained at the Northwest Detention Center who are age 55 years or older or have medical conditions that place them at heightened risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19 as determined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.” This is also the class for settlement purposes.

5. As specified in the Agreement, and notwithstanding the dismissal of this case, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes between and among the Parties arising out of the Agreement, including but not limited to interpretation and enforcement of the terms of the Agreement, except as otherwise provided in the Agreement, for a term of one year after Final Approval because the Presidential national emergency declaration concerning COVID-19 expired on May 11, 2023.

6. Neither the settlement, nor any exhibit, document, or instrument delivered thereunder shall be construed as or deemed to be evidence of an admission or concession by Defendants or an interpretation of any liability or wrongdoing by Defendants, or of the truth of any allegations asserted by Plaintiffs, Class Members, or any other person.

7. The Parties' Stipulated Motion for Final Approval of Proposed Class Settlement (“Motion”) is hereby GRANTED. The Court hereby approves the proposed class-wide relief set forth in the Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Avendano v. Bostock

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 30, 2023
20-cv-700-JLR (W.D. Wash. May. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Avendano v. Bostock

Case Details

Full title:Wilfredo FAVELA AVENDANO, et al., Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. Drew BOSTOCK…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: May 30, 2023

Citations

20-cv-700-JLR (W.D. Wash. May. 30, 2023)