From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avalos v. Velarde

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 23, 2022
351 So. 3d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D22-399

11-23-2022

Vladimir Rolando AVALOS, Appellant, v. Amaury Diaz VELARDE, Appellee.

Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law, LP, and David T. Valero, for appellant. Green, Matzner & Kellner, P.A., and Jay B. Green (Boca Raton); Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Elizabeth K. Russo, for appellee.


Marrero, Chamizo, Marcer Law, LP, and David T. Valero, for appellant.

Green, Matzner & Kellner, P.A., and Jay B. Green (Boca Raton); Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Elizabeth K. Russo, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brookie v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 213 So. 3d 1129, 1131-32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ("Appellee[ ] did not violate any legal duty to Appellant, who observed the condition but was injured by failing to use due care for his own safety .... Appellee[ ] owed no duty to warn Appellant of the open and obvious condition, because Appellees' knowledge of the condition was not ‘superior’ to Appellant's.").


Summaries of

Avalos v. Velarde

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 23, 2022
351 So. 3d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Avalos v. Velarde

Case Details

Full title:Vladimir Rolando AVALOS, Appellant, v. Amaury Diaz VELARDE, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)