From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Avalos v. Hanford Mall 2020 LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2021
1:21-cv-00231-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00231-DAD-SAB

06-03-2021

GEORGE AVALOS, Plaintiff, v. HANFORD MALL 2020 LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (ECF NO. 18)

On June 2, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 18.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys' fees.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Avalos v. Hanford Mall 2020 LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2021
1:21-cv-00231-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Avalos v. Hanford Mall 2020 LLC

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE AVALOS, Plaintiff, v. HANFORD MALL 2020 LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00231-DAD-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)