From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auxier v. Superior County

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division
Oct 21, 2008
No. E045793 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2008)

Opinion


JANET AUXIER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, Respondent CITY OF HESPERIA, Real Party in Interest. E045793 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Second Division October 21, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Larry W. Allen, Judge. Super.Ct.No. CIVVS701824

Pacific Legal Foundation, Meriem L. Hubbard and Timothy Sandefur for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

GAUT, J.

In this matter, we have reviewed the petition and have given real party in interest the opportunity to respond. We have determined that resolution of the matter involves the application of settled principles of law and that issuance of a peremptory writ in the first instance is therefore appropriate. (Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 178.)

Although Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 ff. authorize the court to direct the parties to participate in mediation in most cases where the matter would be subject to mandatory arbitration, cases that raise substantial equitable issues—as does this one—are exempt from arbitration. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.811.) Furthermore, the court should take into account the parties’ views on the “amenability” of the case before ordering mediation. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.871.)

Here, both parties recognize that the case involves equitable and legal issues not amenable to mediation. It appears that the essential question in the action is whether petitioner is subject to a certain land-use regulation. It is reasonable to accept the parties’ position that their disagreement over this question is unlikely to be solved through mediation.

DISPOSITION

Accordingly, we find that the trial court erred in ordering the parties to submit to mediation over their objection. We grant the petition.

Let a peremptory writ of mandate issue, directing the Superior Court of San Bernardino County to vacate its order commanding the parties to participate in mediation. The stay previously ordered is dissolved.

Petitioner is DIRECTED to prepare and have the peremptory writ of mandate issued, copies served, and the original filed with the clerk of this court, together with proof of service on all parties.

Petitioner shall bear her own costs.

We concur: HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J., KING, J.


Summaries of

Auxier v. Superior County

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division
Oct 21, 2008
No. E045793 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Auxier v. Superior County

Case Details

Full title:JANET AUXIER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Second Division

Date published: Oct 21, 2008

Citations

No. E045793 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2008)