From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Autry v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 2, 2023
2:22-cv-00554-TLN-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00554-TLN-JDP (PC)

10-02-2023

JONATHAN COLLIN AUTRY, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JONES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, plaintiff did not sign his second amended complaint. Parties proceeding without counsel are required to sign all pleadings, motions, and other papers submitted to the court for filing. Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a). Thus, the court is unable to consider plaintiff's complaint unless he signs and re-files it. Accordingly, plaintiff is provided an opportunity to re-file his complaint bearing his signature. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall re-file a signed complaint. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Autry v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 2, 2023
2:22-cv-00554-TLN-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Autry v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN COLLIN AUTRY, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 2, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00554-TLN-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2023)