From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Autrey v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 23, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-1289 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-1289

04-23-2013

VERNON AUTREY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN J. THOMAS, et al., Respondents.


(JUDGE CONABOY)

(Magistrate Judge Carlson)


ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 23rd DAY OF APRIL 2013, FOR THE REASONS SET OUT IN THE CONTEMPORANEOUSLY FILED MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Magistrate Judge Carlson's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) is adopted in part;
2. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied;
3. Petitioner's pending motions (Docs. 11, 16, 21) are denied;
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability;
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

____________

RICHARD P. CONABOY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Autrey v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 23, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-1289 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Autrey v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:VERNON AUTREY, Petitioner, v. WARDEN J. THOMAS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 23, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-1289 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 23, 2013)