From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Automatic Phono. Serv. v. Werger

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 8, 1958
17 Misc. 2d 493 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

December 8, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, ANGELO GRACI, J.

Mischa Lazoff for appellant.

Samuel K. Field and Jacob Spatz for respondent.


The motion to vacate the judgment for non-service of process is made as a matter of right, and if no process had been served the judgment is absolutely void and must be vacated. (N.Y. City Mun. Ct. Code, § 129, subd. 1; also, see, Potenza v. Canto, 18 N.Y.S.2d 849, and cases there cited.) The burden is upon the defendant to establish that he was not served with process.

The order on reargument should be reversed on the law, with $10 costs to defendant, original order adhered to, and matter remitted to the Municipal Court for disposition after determining on oral proof whether defendant was served with process.

Concur — PETTE, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Automatic Phono. Serv. v. Werger

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 8, 1958
17 Misc. 2d 493 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Automatic Phono. Serv. v. Werger

Case Details

Full title:AUTOMATIC PHONOGRAPH MAINTENANCE SERVICE, Respondent, v. MURRAY WERGER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1958

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 493 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
191 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

United States v. Barr

This, apart from impairment of credit standing, is such a clear taking or interference of his property…