Automated Solut. Corp. v. Paragon Data Sys

2 Citing cases

  1. Automated v. Paragon

    231 F. App'x 495 (7th Cir. 2007)   Cited 2 times
    Affirming a district court's decision to quash a subpoena because the information sought was irrelevant and available elsewhere

    The Ohio Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of that decision. Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Sys., Inc., 112 Ohio St.3d 1407, 858 N.E.2d 818 (Oh. 2006). While the state court action was pending, the parties found themselves in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, arguing questions of copyright.

  2. Automated Solutions Corp. v. Friedland

    2009 Ohio 3741 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)

    The court of common pleas entered judgment for ASC. This court affirmed in Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Sys., Inc., 167 Ohio App.3d 685, 2006-Ohio-3492, 856 N.E.2d 1008, and the Supreme Court did not accept the appeal for review, Automated Solutions Corp. v Paragon Data Sys., Inc., 112 Ohio St.3d 1407, 2006-Ohio-6447, 858 N.E.2d 818. ASC and Paragon are also parties to an action for copyright infringement and tortious interference with business interests in Automated Solutions Corp. v. Paragon Data Sys., Inc., N.D. Ohio No. 1:05-CV-1519 ("the Federal Case"). {ΒΆ 2} Paragon commenced a legal malpractice action β€” Paragon Data Sys., Inc. v. Brouse McDowell, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CV-614746 ("the malpractice action") β€” which has been assigned to respondent.