From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Hambuchen Constr., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 18, 2016
NO: 4:16CV00005 SWW (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2016)

Opinion

NO: 4:16CV00005 SWW

11-18-2016

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff/Counter Defendant v. HAMBUCHEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., GRETCHEN PIERCE, and RANDY PIERCE Defendants/Counter Plaintiff


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Opinion and Order filed on this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company. IT IS HEREBY DECLARED that the coverages of commercial general liability policy of insurance, Policy No. 062324-03778679-08, does not require the insurer, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company, to either defend or to indemnify the insured, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff Hambuchen Construction, Inc., for claims asserted in the judicial actions Pierce v. Hambuchen Construction, Inc., No. 60CV-13-1464, currently pending in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas, and Lessmann v. Hambuchen, No. 23CV-09-495, previously pending in the Circuit Court of Faulkner County, Arkansas.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016.

/s/ Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Hambuchen Constr., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 18, 2016
NO: 4:16CV00005 SWW (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Hambuchen Constr., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff/Counter Defendant v. HAMBUCHEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 18, 2016

Citations

NO: 4:16CV00005 SWW (E.D. Ark. Nov. 18, 2016)

Citing Cases

State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. The Eureka Springs City Advert. & Promotional Comm.

Given that the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify, “if there is no duty to defend, there is…