From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Autin v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 6, 2020
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01035 SEC P (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01035 SEC P

03-06-2020

TROY ADAM AUTIN #452745 v. TERRY COOLEY ET AL


JUDGE JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 86] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 72] be DENIED, that the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [doc. 58] be GRANTED, and that the remaining claims in this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Compel [doc. 81] and Motion for Subpoena [doc. 82] be DENIED AS MOOT.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 6th day of March, 2020.

/s/ _________

JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Autin v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 6, 2020
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01035 SEC P (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Autin v. Cooley

Case Details

Full title:TROY ADAM AUTIN #452745 v. TERRY COOLEY ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01035 SEC P (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2020)