Authentec, Inc. v. Atrua Technologies, Inc.

Full title: AUTHENTEC, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ATRUA TECHNOLOGIES…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Case No. C08-01423 PJH (WDB) (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. C08-01423 PJH (WDB).

February 24, 2009

MARK L. HOGGE ( Pro Hac Vice), SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI ( Pro Hac Vice), GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, Washington, D.C.

J. JAMES LI (SBN 202855), DAVID PEREZ (SBN 238136), GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, East Palo Alto, California, Attorneys for Defendant, ATRUA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

[ PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT ATRUA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL, PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 79-5(d)

WAYNE BRAZIL, Magistrate JudgePage 2

Upon consideration of all papers filed and all arguments presented with respect to Defendant and Counterclaimant Atrua Technologies, Inc.'s ("Atrua") Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d), and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is conditionally GRANTED;

2. Exhibits B to the Perez Decl. shall be filed conditionally under seal; and

3. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d), AuthenTec is hereby ordered, by February 27, 2009, to file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that Exhibit B is sealable, and lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality. If AuthenTec does not file the responsive declaration, Exhibit B will be made part of the public record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.