From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Mar 31, 2008
3:08cv134 (3:05cr213) (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2008)

Opinion

3:08cv134 (3:05cr213).

March 31, 2008


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on initial consideration of the petitioner's Motion for New Trial Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed March 25, 2008. (Doc. No. 1).

The petitioner was indicted on July 27, 2006, for conspiracy to possess with intent to deliver cocaine and crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(B)(1)(A) (Count One) and attempting to possess with intent to deliver cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1) and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Count Two). (Case No. 3:05cr213, Doc. No. 73: Superseding Indictment). On August 15, 2006, following a two-day trial, he was convicted of both offenses. (Case No. 3:05cr213, Doc. No. 117: Jury Verdict). The petitioner is scheduled for sentencing on April 1, 2008.

Title 28, United States Code § 2255 applies to "[a] prisoner under sentence of a court" of the United States. Thus, where a federal prisoner has not yet been sentenced, a district court lacks jurisdiction over a motion brought under § 2255. Stantini v. United States, 140 F.3d 424, 427 (2d Cir. 1998). Ordinarily, a prisoner is sentenced and exhausts his direct appeal before filing a § 2255 motion. Id. at 426. Here, the Court lacks jurisdiction over the motion because it was prematurely filed before sentencing.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for New Trial Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice to be re-filed by the defendant at the appropriate time.


Summaries of

Austin v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Mar 31, 2008
3:08cv134 (3:05cr213) (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Austin v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:RANDOLPH HARRIS AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2008

Citations

3:08cv134 (3:05cr213) (W.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2008)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hall

Clay v. United States, 537 U.S. 522, 532 (2003) (same). “Thus, where a federal prisoner has not yet been…

United States v. Ford

"Thus, where a federal prisoner has not yet been sentenced, a district court lacks jurisdiction over a motion…