From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 19, 2017
No. 4D17-2422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2017)

Opinion

No. 4D17-2422

10-19-2017

HERICAN AUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Herican Austin, Cross City, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-008420-CF10A. Herican Austin, Cross City, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CIKLIK, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Austin v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Oct 19, 2017
No. 4D17-2422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Austin v. State

Case Details

Full title:HERICAN AUSTIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

No. 4D17-2422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 19, 2017)