From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2009
2:09cv1111 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2009)

Opinion

2:09cv1111 Electronic Filing.

October 7, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2009, after the Petitioner, Ronnie Austin, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the petitioner, and upon written review of the petition and the record and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Document No. 8), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner (Document No. 5) is dismissed and a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the Petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Austin v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2009
2:09cv1111 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Austin v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE AUSTIN, Petitioner, v. GEROLD ROZUM, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 7, 2009

Citations

2:09cv1111 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2009)