From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. Rochester Folding Box Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

November, 1920.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the admission of evidence offered by the plaintiff, concerning the condition of his family was reversible error, which was not cured by striking out the evidence in the absence of the jury. ( Purcell v. Duncan Co., 107 App. Div. 501.) All concur, except Kruse, P.J., who dissents and votes for affirmance.


Summaries of

Austin v. Rochester Folding Box Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

Austin v. Rochester Folding Box Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE AUSTIN, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER FOLDING BOX COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1920

Citations

194 App. Div. 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)