From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austin v. Internal Revenue Serv. IRS

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 2, 2021
21-cv-02637-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-02637-HSG

12-02-2021

GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IRS ET. AL., Defendant.


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

RE: DKT. NOS. 36, 38, 39

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 25, 2021, Plaintiff moved for leave to file an amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 36. On November 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed two additional motions, appearing to once again ask for leave to file an amended complaint and to continue any hearing until after leave to file an amended complaint is granted. See Dkt. Nos. 38, 39. Under the local civil rules for the Northern District of California, “any party filing or moving to file an amended pleading must reproduce the entire proposed pleading . . . .” Civil L.R. 10-1. In his motions, Plaintiff does not explain how he intends to amend his complaint, nor does he attach a proposed amended complaint. See Dkt. Nos. 36, 38, 39.

Defendant's motion to dismiss is also pending, see Dkt. No. 29, with that motion set to be heard on December 9, 2021. If necessary, the Court will address whether amendment is warranted in ruling on the motion to dismiss. 1

Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiffs motions (docket numbers 36, 38, and 39).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2


Summaries of

Austin v. Internal Revenue Serv. IRS

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 2, 2021
21-cv-02637-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Austin v. Internal Revenue Serv. IRS

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IRS ET. AL.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 2, 2021

Citations

21-cv-02637-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2021)