From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Austad v. Risley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 1984
743 F.2d 739 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-3933.

September 25, 1984.

Curtis G. Thompson, Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett Weaver, Great Falls, Mont., for petitioner-appellant.

Margaret M. Joyce Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., for respondents-appellees.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case 739 F.2d 428, be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.


Summaries of

Austad v. Risley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 1984
743 F.2d 739 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Austad v. Risley

Case Details

Full title:GENE ANDREW AUSTAD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. HENRY RISLEY AND THOMAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 1984

Citations

743 F.2d 739 (9th Cir. 1984)