From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aurora Commercial Corp. v. Paramount Residential Mortg. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 10, 2014
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03235-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03235-REB-BNB

04-10-2014

AURORA COMMERCIAL CORP., Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#56], filed March 17, 2014. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).

"[#56]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

Finding no error, much less plain error, in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that recommendation should be approved and adopted. It appears clear to this court, as it did to the magistrate judge, that the parties verbally reached a settlement sufficiently specific in all essential terms to be enforceable. Defendant's subsequent change of heart provides no grounds for it to avoid that agreement.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#56], filed March 17, 2014, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That Plaintiff's Motion To Enforce Settlement [#48], filed February 18, 2014, is GRANTED;

3. That Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#44], filed January 31, 2014, is DENIED AS MOOT;

4. That all pretrial deadlines, the combined Final Pretrial Conference and Trial Preparation Conference, set Friday, May 2, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., and the bench trial, scheduled to commence May 5, 2014, are VACATED; and

5. That this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, subject to the lump sum payment of $80,000 from defendant to plaintiff and delivery to defendant by plaintiff of a general release of all claims.

Dated April 10, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Aurora Commercial Corp. v. Paramount Residential Mortg. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 10, 2014
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03235-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Aurora Commercial Corp. v. Paramount Residential Mortg. Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AURORA COMMERCIAL CORP., Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 10, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03235-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2014)