Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02835-REB-MEH
02-05-2013
AURORA BANK FSP, a Federal Savings Bank, Plaintiff, v. DIRECT MORTGAGE, CORP., a Utah corporation, Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on February 5, 2013.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint or, in the alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement [filed January 10, 2013; docket #11]. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff filed an amended complaint as a matter of course within 21 days after service of Defendant's Motion. Therefore, Defendant's Motion is denied as moot. See Franklin v. Kansas Dep't of Corr., 160 F. App'x 730, 734 (10th Cir. 2005) ("An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders the original complaint of no legal effect.") (citing Miller v. Glanz, 948 F. 2d 1562, 1565 (10th Cir. 1991)).