From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. The Republic of Arg.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
1:19-CV-0351 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-CV-0351 (LAP) 1:19-CV-09786 (LAP) 1:19-CV-10109 (LAP) 1:19-CV-10131 (LAP) 1:19-CV-11338 (LAP)

05-20-2022

AURELIUS CAPITAL MASTER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant. NOVORIVER S.A., Plaintiff v. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC, Defendant. ACP MASTER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant 683 CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP, Plaintiff, v. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant. ADONA LLC, EGOZ I LLC, EGOZ II LLC, MASTERGEN, LLC, ERYTHRINA, LLC, AP 2016 1, LLC, AP 2014 3A, LLC, AP 2014 2, LLC, AND WASO HOLDING CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant.


LETTER OF REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE (LETTER ROGATORY)

HON. LORETTA A. PRESKA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

INTRODUCTION

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York presents its compliments to the Argentine Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Worship and the appropriate judicial authority of Argentina and requests international judicial assistance to obtain evidence to be used in a civil proceeding before this Court in the above-captioned actions.

The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is the competent court of law and equity over the above-captioned actions and has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1330. This Court is authorized to request depositions abroad by letters of request under 28 U.S.C. § 1781(b)(2) and Chapter I of the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (the “Hague Convention”), 23 U.S.T. 2555, T.I.A.S. No. 7444. This Court may grant reciprocal assistance by the enforcement of letters of request from the Argentine courts pursuant to its authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1782.

ASSISTANCE REQUESTED

This Court requests the assistance described herein as necessary in the interests of justice. Specifically, this Court requests that the appropriate judicial authority of Argentina compel Facundo Bocco Proietti to provide testimony on the subject matter described in Exhibit A to this Letter of Request for International Judicial Assistance. Testimony should be given under oath, which may be taken in accordance with domestic procedure in Argentina. This Court requests that, to the extent possible, the appropriate judicial authority of Argentina audio and video record the testimony, in addition to transcribing the testimony in writing. This Court requests that the appropriate judicial authority of Argentina allow local Argentine counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned actions (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) to question Facundo Bocco Proietti and allow for cross-examination. This Court requests that the appropriate judicial authority of Argentina directly inform the parties or their representatives (at the addresses provided below) of the time and place at which the testimony will take place. This Court further requests that the appropriate judicial authority of Argentina allow Plaintiffs' United States counsel to observe the examination by videoconference.

See Hague Convention, Article 9 (“The judicial authority which executes a Letter of Request shall .... follow a request of the requesting authority that a special method or procedure be followed, unless this is incompatible with the internal law of the State of execution or is impossible of performance by reason of its internal practice and procedure or by reason of practical difficulties”).

See id.; see also Codigo Procesal Civil y Comercial de la Nacion (CPCCN), Article 442.

See Hague Convention, Article 7 (“The requesting authority shall, if it so desires, be informed of the time when, and the place where, the proceedings will take place, in order that the parties concerned, and their representatives, if any, may be present. This information shall be sent directly to the parties or their representatives when the authority of the State of origin so requests”).

PERSON TO WHOM THE EXECUTED REQUEST IS TO BE RETURNED

The address of the person to whom the executed request is to be returned is:

The Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Judge

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street

New York, New York 10007-1312

United States of America

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION OF PARTIES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES

The addresses of the parties to these proceedings and their representatives are as follows:

Party

Representatives

Plaintiffs Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. and ACP Master, Ltd.

Edward A. Friedman Daniel B. Rapport Michael S. Palmieri Jacob L. Hirsch Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 833-1100 Facsimile: (212) 833-1250 Ricardo Ramírez-Calvo Av. Córdoba 1215, piso 8 1055 Ciudad de Buenos Aires República Argentina Telephone: (54 11) 4816 2877

Plaintiff 683 Capital Partners, LP

Matthew M. Riccardi H. Rowan Gaither IV Perkins Coie LLP 1155 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 261-6900 Facsimile: (212) 977-1649

Plaintiff Novoriver S.A.

Evan A. Kubota Javier Bleichmar Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP 7 Times Square, 27th Floor New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 789-1341 Facsimile: (212) 205-3961

Plaintiffs Adona LLC, Egoz I LLC, Egoz II LLC, Mastergen, LLC, Erythrina, LLC, AP 2016 1, LLC, AP 2014 3A, LLC, AP 2014 2, LLC, and WASO Holding Corporation

Christopher J. Clark Matthew S. Salerno Latham & Watkins LLP 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 906-1200 Facsimile: (212) 751-4864

Defendant Argentine Republic, also known as the Republic of Argentina

Robert J. Giuffra, Jr. Sergio J. Galvis Joseph E. Neuhaus Thomas C. White Jonathan J. Ossip Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 Amanda Flug Davidoff Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 1700 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 956-7500 Facsimile (202) 293-6330

The addresses of the person from whom testimony is being requested is:

Facundo Bocco Proietti

Av. Hipolito Yrigoyen 250, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Ministerio de Economía de la Provincia de Buenos Aires

Calle 45, B1900 La Plata

Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina

SUMMARY OF THE ACTIONS

The Court does not adopt this summary as findings of fact or law. Based solely on Plaintiffs' representations, this Court believes that justice cannot be served between the parties in the above-captioned actions unless the evidence requested herein is made available by the appropriate judicial authority of Argentina.

Plaintiffs commenced the above-captioned civil actions in 2019 against Defendant The Republic of Argentina (“Argentina” or “the Republic”). Plaintiffs assert that the Republic breached its express and implied contractual obligations arising out of securities issued by the Republic known as U.S. Dollar-Denominated GDP-Linked Securities (the “GDP Warrants” or “Warrants”). Pursuant to the terms of the GDP Warrants, the Republic agreed to make payments to Warrant holders such as Plaintiffs when Argentina's GDP exceeded certain contractually-defined thresholds during a given calendar year. Plaintiffs contend those conditions were met for 2013 and a payment is therefore due to them for that year. Argentina disputes Plaintiffs' claims and asserts that no payment is due.

RECIPROCITY

In the furtherance of justice and by the proper and usual process of this Court, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York may provide similar cooperation and assistance to the Argentine courts in the event that the Argentine courts request similar assistance.

REIMBURSEMENT FOR COSTS

The fees and costs incurred, which are reimbursable under the second paragraph of Article 14 or under Article 26 of the Hague Convention, will be borne by Plaintiffs.

CONCLUSION

This Court expresses its appreciation and respectfully requests that, in the interests of justice, you compel by your proper and usual process Facundo Bocco Proietti to provide testimony.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. The Republic of Arg.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
1:19-CV-0351 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd. v. The Republic of Arg.

Case Details

Full title:AURELIUS CAPITAL MASTER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 20, 2022

Citations

1:19-CV-0351 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)