From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aureliano v. Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1986
124 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

November 17, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs, in their summons, designated Nassau County as the venue for the instant action on the ground that it was the "defendant's place of business".

The motion of the defendants Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc. and Norton Simon, Inc. was one to change venue as a matter of right, on the ground that the county selected by the plaintiffs for trial was not proper, i.e., that none of the defendants had their principal offices in Nassau County (see, CPLR 503 [c]; 510 [1]). To change venue as a matter of right, these defendants were obligated to serve a "demand * * * for change of place of trial" either before or with the service of their answer, pursuant to CPLR 511 (a). The movants failed to comply with this requirement. Although their motion for a change of venue could have been granted in the court's discretion (see, De Litta v Milde, 52 A.D.2d 548), under all of the circumstances herein, including the laches involved, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to change venue from Nassau County to Suffolk County. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Aureliano v. Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1986
124 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Aureliano v. Hunt-Wesson Foods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PETRA AURELIANO, Respondent, v. HUNT-WESSON FOODS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1986

Citations

124 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Roman v. Long Island Lighting Company

The defendants failed to comply with this requirement. In addition, under the circumstances of this case, the…

Redelick v. Williford

The appellants failed to comply with this requirement. Although that branch of their motion could have been…