From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aultman v. Maggio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Feb 26, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1133 (W.D. La. Feb. 26, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1133

02-26-2018

STACEY AULTMAN, ET AL. v. VIJAY MAGGIO, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE JOSEPH PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered [Doc. No. 75], no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that the Report and Recommendation is supported by the law and the record,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 72] filed by Plaintiffs Stacey Aultman and Heather Aultman is GRANTED, and any and all remaining claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss Intervention [Doc. No. 73] filed by Intervenor Plaintiffs O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc. and Ace American Insurance Company is GRANTED, and any and all claims and causes of action asserted by Intervenor Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 26th day of February, 2018.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Aultman v. Maggio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Feb 26, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1133 (W.D. La. Feb. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Aultman v. Maggio

Case Details

Full title:STACEY AULTMAN, ET AL. v. VIJAY MAGGIO, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 26, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1133 (W.D. La. Feb. 26, 2018)