Opinion
2:22-cv-01818-RSL
01-25-2023
VIRGINIA AULIN, Plaintiff, v. BRADLEY W. KIRSCHNER, an individual; and HAGEN, KURTH, PERMAN & CO., P.S., Defendants.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Virginia Aulin CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN, P.S. Mark Rosencrantz, WSBA #26552 Teva F. Sempel Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants: BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC Wilhelm Dingier, WSBA #Z3474“ Antoine J. Smith, WSBA #57968 Attorneys for Defendants
Attorneys for Plaintiff Virginia Aulin
CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN, P.S.
Mark Rosencrantz, WSBA #26552
Teva F. Sempel
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendants:
BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC
Wilhelm Dingier, WSBA #Z3474“
Antoine J. Smith, WSBA #57968
Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT
ROBERT S. LASNIK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.
STIPULATION
Plaintiffs and Defendants by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On December 23, 2022, Defendants removed the subject action from the Superior Court of Washington for King County to this Court based on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2), this action may not be removed on the basis of 28 U.S.C. 1332(a) because while the matter is between citizens of different states, parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants are citizens of the State in which the action was brought.. Accordingly, the parties through counsel of record stipulate to the remand of this case back to the State Court.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.