From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auld v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2012
Case No. 10-cv-14615 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-14615

01-31-2012

DANNY DOUGLAS AULD, II, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge


Mark A. Randon

United States Magistrate Judge


OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. No. 9), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 7), (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 8), AND

(4) AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon's Report and Recommendation on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 9). The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the decision of the Commissioner.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and:

(1) DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment;

(2) GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and

(3) AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

This Order closes the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Auld v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2012
Case No. 10-cv-14615 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Auld v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:DANNY DOUGLAS AULD, II, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-14615 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 31, 2012)