From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auld v. Cent. N.M. Cmty. Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
May 29, 2015
Civ. No. 14-636 KG/SCY (D.N.M. May. 29, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 14-636 KG/SCY

05-29-2015

RIEMA AULD, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PFRD") advising that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Pam Etre-Perez, Tom Pierce, and Carol Adler without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Doc. 36. In this PFRD, Judge Yarbrough explains that Plaintiff has failed to serve these Defendants despite being given a lengthy extension to do so. Id. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the PFRD, thereby waiving her right to review of the proposed dismissal of these claims. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). Furthermore, upon review of the record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (doc. 36) is ADOPTED.



2. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Pam Etre-Perez, Tom Pierce, and Carol Adler will be dismissed without prejudice by separate order.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Auld v. Cent. N.M. Cmty. Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
May 29, 2015
Civ. No. 14-636 KG/SCY (D.N.M. May. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Auld v. Cent. N.M. Cmty. Coll.

Case Details

Full title:RIEMA AULD, Plaintiff, v. CENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: May 29, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 14-636 KG/SCY (D.N.M. May. 29, 2015)