Augustine v. Southern Bell Telephone Tel. Co.

1 Citing case

  1. Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Small Fry, Inc.

    709 F. Supp. 1144 (S.D. Fla. 1989)   Cited 2 times
    Finding no duty to indemnify after concluding that insurer had no duty to defend

    The motion for a more definite statement has, for all practical purposes, taken the place of the former motion for compulsory amendment. Augustine v. Southern Bell Tel. Tel. Co., 91 So.2d 320 (Fla. 1957). This Court finds that it must read the "more definite statement" in conjunction with the complaint in resolving the pending summary judgment motion.