From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Augstein v. Banska a Hutni Akciova Spolecnost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1953
282 AD 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion


282 A.D. 929 125 N.Y.S.2d 647 OTTO AUGSTEIN, Respondent, v. BANSKA A HUTNI AKCIOVA SPOLECNOST et al., Appellants. Supreme Court of New York, First Department. November 10, 1953

         The orders appealed from are modified to the extent that the objections of the defendants to the jurisdiction of the court are overruled, and in the exercise of discretion defendants are allowed to allege the same facts presented upon this motion in their respective answers (Civ. Prac. Act, § 237-a, subd. 3, par. [c]).

         Present--Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm; Callahan, J., taking no part. Settle order on notice.

Summaries of

Augstein v. Banska a Hutni Akciova Spolecnost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 10, 1953
282 AD 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Augstein v. Banska a Hutni Akciova Spolecnost

Case Details

Full title:OTTO AUGSTEIN, Respondent, v. BANSKA A HUTNI AKCIOVA SPOLECNOST et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1953

Citations

282 AD 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
282 App. Div. 929
125 N.Y.S.2d 647

Citing Cases

Stephen v. Zivnostenska Banka

Presently, we are confronted with the problems of Czech nationalization, just as once before we wrestled with…

Schwartz v. Compania Azucarera

However, the acquisition under such circumstances is opposed by the defendant and by the receiver, who has…