From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Aug 21, 2012
Case No. C-09-5386 JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. C-09-5386 JCS

08-21-2012

AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant. YAHOO! INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and WORLD TALK RADIO, LLC, Counterclaim Defendants.

RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421) RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) DANIEL P. MUINO (CA SBN 209624) J. RYAN GILFOIL (CA SBN 246493) JOHN K. BLAKE, JR. (CA SBN 262906) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff YAHOO! INC.


RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
DANIEL P. MUINO (CA SBN 209624)
J. RYAN GILFOIL (CA SBN 246493)
JOHN K. BLAKE, JR. (CA SBN 262906)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
YAHOO! INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER SEALING

PORTIONS OF THE COURT'S

AUGUST 8, 2012 SUMMARY

JUDGMENT ORDER


Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero

IT IS ORDERED THAT Yahoo! Inc.'s request that portions of the Court's August 8, 2012 Order Granting Yahoo!'s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Augme's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ("Summary Judgment Order") be filed under seal is GRANTED.

Accordingly, the designated portions of the Summary Judgment Order shall be filed under seal, and a public redacted version of the Summary Judgment Order shall be filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Aug 21, 2012
Case No. C-09-5386 JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant. YAHOO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

Case No. C-09-5386 JCS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2012)

Citing Cases

Thought, Inc. v. Oracle Corp.

Having granted Oracle's summary judgment motion on non-infringement, I need not consider Oracle's declaratory…

Augme Techs., Inc. v. Yahoo! Inc.

because it determined, as a matter of law, that Yahoo!'s ad codes were not service responses. Augme Techs.,…