From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Audoban Soc'y of Portland v. Zinke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 6, 2020
1:17-cv-69-CL (lead) (D. Or. Apr. 6, 2020)

Opinion

1:17-cv-69-CL (lead) 1:17-cv-98-CL (trailing) 1:17-cv-468-CL (trailing) 1:17-cv-531-CL (trailing)

04-06-2020

AUDOBAN SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RYAN ZINKE, et al., Defendants. TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al., Defendant-Intervenors.


JUDGMENT :

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 215), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Numerous parties filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 215) is adopted. Motions and cross-motions for summary judgment ## 143, 146, 157, 159, 161, and 162 are GRANTED. Motion # 148 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The remaining motions, including motion to strike # 232, are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 6th day of April, 2020.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Audoban Soc'y of Portland v. Zinke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 6, 2020
1:17-cv-69-CL (lead) (D. Or. Apr. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Audoban Soc'y of Portland v. Zinke

Case Details

Full title:AUDOBAN SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RYAN ZINKE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 6, 2020

Citations

1:17-cv-69-CL (lead) (D. Or. Apr. 6, 2020)