From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Audibel v. Borland

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 26, 2006
No. CV 05-2614-PCT-PGR (D. Ariz. Jun. 26, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 05-2614-PCT-PGR.

June 26, 2006


ORDER


Pursuant to the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Responses to Outstanding Discovery Requests (Doc. 19), and good cause appearing,

The present motion was filed with the Court on May 30, 2006. According to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(c), if the Defendants opposed the Plaintiffs' motion they were required to file a responsive memorandum with the Court within ten (10) days after service. However, the Defendants failed to file a response opposing the Plaintiffs motion nor did they request an extension from the Court enabling them to file a delayed response.

IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Responses to Outstanding Discovery Requests (Doc. 19) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to all outstanding discovery within ten (10) days of the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Audibel v. Borland

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 26, 2006
No. CV 05-2614-PCT-PGR (D. Ariz. Jun. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Audibel v. Borland

Case Details

Full title:Audibel, a Division of Starkey Laboratories, Inc., and Starkey…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 26, 2006

Citations

No. CV 05-2614-PCT-PGR (D. Ariz. Jun. 26, 2006)