From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 1939
257 App. Div. 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Summary

In Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp. (257 A.D. 857) an order denying preference was reversed on the ground plaintiff was a public charge, that before the injury she was on home relief and that the showing of destitution was complete.

Summary of this case from Brown v. Upfold

Opinion

May 29, 1939.


Order denying a preference to the plaintiff in a tort action reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the motion granted, and the case set down for trial five days after the entry of the order hereon. The denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. The plaintiff is a public charge. Before entry in the hospital she was on home relief. The showing of destitution is complete. Under such circumstances the rule is well settled that a preference must be granted. ( Hardison v. Byrd, 252 App. Div. 758, and cases cited.) Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 29, 1939
257 App. Div. 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

In Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp. (257 A.D. 857) an order denying preference was reversed on the ground plaintiff was a public charge, that before the injury she was on home relief and that the showing of destitution was complete.

Summary of this case from Brown v. Upfold

In Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp. (257 App. Div. 857 [1939]) an order denying preference was reversed on the ground plaintiff was a public charge, that before the injury she was on home relief and that the showing of destitution was complete.

Summary of this case from Brown v. Upfold
Case details for

Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ROSE AUCHELLO, Appellant, v. BROOKLYN BUS CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 29, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Bridge Auto Renting Corporation

It is the established rule that where a person is on relief and, therefore, a public charge, such person is…

Rogers v. Derris

Order reversed on the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. In our…