Opinion
Case No. C-11-3170 EMC
10-13-2011
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
RON E. SHULMAN (Bar No. 178263) BOB STEINBERG (Bar No. 126407) LATHAM &WATKINS LLP LAWRENCE J. GOTTS ( pro hac vice ) BERT C. REISER ( pro hac vice ) LATHAM &WATKINS LLP JULIE M. HOLLOWAY (Bar No. 196942) LATHAM &WATKINS LLP Attorneys for AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA Marcus Quintanilla Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC.; AT&T MOBILITY LLC; BEST BUY STORES, L.P.; BESTBUY.COM, LLC; BEST BUY PURCHASING, LLC; and INTERBOND CORPORATION OF AMERICA D/B/A BRANDSMART U.S.A. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI S. Michael Song Attorneys for Defendants ACER INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, BENQCORP., and BENQAMERICA CORP. KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Michael A. Dorfman Attorneys for Defendants SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD. and SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
RON E. SHULMAN (Bar No. 178263)
BOB STEINBERG (Bar No. 126407)
LATHAM &WATKINS LLP
LAWRENCE J. GOTTS (pro hac vice)
BERT C. REISER (pro hac vice)
LATHAM &WATKINS LLP
JULIE M. HOLLOWAY (Bar No. 196942)
LATHAM &WATKINS LLP
Attorneys for
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-1(A) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND FOR AUO PARTIES TO RESPOND TO SAMSUNG'S COUNTERCLAIMS Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America (collectively "AUO"); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Samsung"); AT&T Mobility LLC; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; BestBuy.com, LLC; Best Buy Purchasing, LLC; Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart U.S.A.(collectively "Samsung Customer Defendants"); SANYO Electric Co., Ltd.; SANYO Manufacturing Corporation; Acer America Corporation; Acer Inc.; BenQ America Corp.; and BenQ Corp. (collectively "AUO Customer Counterclaim Defendants") stipulate: (1) to extend the time within which Samsung Customer Defendants are permitted to answer or otherwise respond to AUO's First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement in this action; and (2) to extend the time within which AUO and AUO Customer Counterclaim Defendants are permitted to answer or otherwise respond to Samsung's Counterclaims. The stipulated response date is December 1, 2011. This will not alter any deadlines fixed by the Court. In addition, any parties to this stipulation that have not been served waive the requirement that they be served with a summons pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, Bob Steinberg hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories listed below.
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Bob Steinberg
Attorneys for
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
O'MELVENY AND MYERS LLP
Marcus Quintanilla
Attorneys for Defendants
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.;
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC.;
AT&T MOBILITY LLC; BEST BUY STORES, L.P.;
BESTBUY.COM, LLC; BEST BUY PURCHASING, LLC;
and INTERBOND CORPORATION OF AMERICA D/B/A
BRANDSMART U.S.A.
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
S. Michael Song
Attorneys for Defendants
ACER INC.,
ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,
BENQCORP., and
BENQAMERICA CORP.
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
Michael A. Dorfman
Attorneys for Defendants
SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD. and
SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Judge Edward M. Chen