From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorneys Liab. Prot. Soc'y, Inc. v. Lowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jan 5, 2012
Civil No. 2:10-02267 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 2:10-02267

01-05-2012

ATTORNEYS LIABILITY PROTECTION SOCIETY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROBERT J. LOWE, JR., LOWE & ASSOCIATES, P.C., AND TUTTLE DOZER WORKS, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on plaintiff's and defendants' cross motions for summary judgment. On the issue of coverage, the burden of proof is on the insured to show that a claim falls within the coverage of an insurance contract, Gamble v. Travelers Ins. Co., 160 S.E.2d 523, 525 (S.C. 1968), while the insurer bears the burden of establishing exclusions to coverage, Boggs v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 252 S.E.2d 565, 568 (1979). Having thoroughly considered the parties' written and oral submissions, the court holds that genuine issues of material fact exist, including but not limited to, the significance of the jury's verdict amount. Therefore, the court DENIES all motions for summary judgment.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

DAVID C. NORTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

January 5, 2012

Charleston, South Carolina


Summaries of

Attorneys Liab. Prot. Soc'y, Inc. v. Lowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jan 5, 2012
Civil No. 2:10-02267 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Attorneys Liab. Prot. Soc'y, Inc. v. Lowe

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEYS LIABILITY PROTECTION SOCIETY, INC., Plaintiff, v. ROBERT J…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 2:10-02267 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2012)