From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 7, 2004
862 A.2d 991 (Md. 2004)

Opinion

Misc. AG No. 27, September Term, 2004.

December 7, 2004.


ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(b). Upon review of said Joint Petition and for reasons set forth therein, it is this 7th day of December, 2004,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Bonar Mayo Robertson, be and he is hereby, reprimanded for misconduct in violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4, 1.5, and 8.4(d).


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Dec 7, 2004
862 A.2d 991 (Md. 2004)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Bonar Mayo…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Dec 7, 2004

Citations

862 A.2d 991 (Md. 2004)
862 A.2d 991

Citing Cases

Attorney Grievance v. Robertson

In addition to the suspension imposed in 2005, respondent received a reprimand on December 7, 2004 from the…