From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 22, 1998
708 A.2d 681 (Md. 1998)

Opinion

Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 79, September Term, 1997.

April 22, 1998.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted to this Court by Petitioner and Respondent, it is this 22nd day of April, 1998

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Thomas Vincent McCoy, be and hereby is REPRIMANDED for his violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, by failing to provide diligent representation to a client, and 1.4(a), by failing to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the representation and promptly comply with requests for information, and 8.4(a) and (d) by engaging in conduct in violation of the rules of Professional Conduct and engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Apr 22, 1998
708 A.2d 681 (Md. 1998)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance v. McCoy

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, PETITIONER, v. THOMAS VINCENT…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Apr 22, 1998

Citations

708 A.2d 681 (Md. 1998)
708 A.2d 681