From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Com'n v. Joe

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 1, 2005
885 A.2d 339 (Md. 2005)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 54 September Term, 2005.

November 1, 2005.


ORDER

The parties herein have jointly petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of the said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 1st day of November, 2005

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Isaac Joe, Jr., be, and is hereby, reprimanded for his violation of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 1.4 and 8.1(b).


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Com'n v. Joe

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 1, 2005
885 A.2d 339 (Md. 2005)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Com'n v. Joe

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION of Maryland, Petitioner, v. Isaac JOE, Jr.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Nov 1, 2005

Citations

885 A.2d 339 (Md. 2005)
885 A.2d 339