From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Viladegut

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Mar 1, 2021
Misc. Docket AG No. 54 (Md. Mar. 1, 2021)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 54

03-01-2021

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. ANGEL ARTURO VILADEGUT


Circuit Court for Montgomery County
Case No. 477327-V Barbera, C. J., McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER

PER CURIAM ORDER

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 1st day of March 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Angel Arturo Viladegut be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Angel Arturo Viladegut from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Angel Arturo Viladegut.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Viladegut

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Mar 1, 2021
Misc. Docket AG No. 54 (Md. Mar. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Viladegut

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. ANGEL ARTURO VILADEGUT

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Date published: Mar 1, 2021

Citations

Misc. Docket AG No. 54 (Md. Mar. 1, 2021)