From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Resnick

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Mar 18, 2021
Misc. Docket AG No. 16 (Md. Mar. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 16

03-18-2021

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. JONATHAN STEVEN RESNICK, PERRY ANDREW RESNICK, and LOUIS J. GLICK


(No. C-03-CV-20-002490, Circuit Court for Baltimore County)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Louis J. Glick, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in the above-captioned case, it is this 18th day of March, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Louis J. Glick, be, and he hereby is, reprimanded for violating Maryland Rules 19-308.4(a) (misconduct) and 19-410(a) (prohibited transactions); and it is further

ORDERED, that the above-captioned case is hereby concluded as to all Respondents, dispositive action having previously been taken as to Jonathan Steven Resnick and Perry Andrew Resnick.

/s/ Robert N. McDonald

Senior Judge


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Resnick

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Mar 18, 2021
Misc. Docket AG No. 16 (Md. Mar. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Resnick

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. JONATHAN STEVEN RESNICK…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Date published: Mar 18, 2021

Citations

Misc. Docket AG No. 16 (Md. Mar. 18, 2021)