From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Langrall

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
May 22, 2020
468 Md. 631 (Md. 2020)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 95 Sept. Term, 2019

05-22-2020

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Craig Harrison LANGRALL


ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Craig Harrison Langrall, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, to disbar the Respondent from the practice law, it is this 22nd day of May, 2020,

ORDERED , that the Respondent, Craig Harrison Langrall, be and he hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for violation of Rules 1.1 (Competence), 1.2 (Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Attorney), 1.3 (Diligence), 1.4 (Communication), 1.7 (Conflict of Interest-General Rule), 4.1 (Truthfulness in Statements to Others), and 8.4 (a)–(d) (Misconduct) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct and Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Craig Harrison Langrall from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rules 19-736(d) and 19-761.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Langrall

COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
May 22, 2020
468 Md. 631 (Md. 2020)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Langrall

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. CRAIG HARRISON LANGRALL

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Date published: May 22, 2020

Citations

468 Md. 631 (Md. 2020)
228 A.3d 450