From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Woo-Jin Kim

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sep 16, 2016
450 Md. 49 (Md. 2016)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 33, Sept. Term, 2016

09-16-2016

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner v. Woo-Jin Kim, Respondent


ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.15(a) and 8.4(b), (c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct in effect at the time of the misconduct, it is this 16th day of September, 2016,ORDERED, that Woo-Jin Kim, Respondent, is hereby disbarred by consent from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Woo-Jin Kim from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(1), and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-761(b).


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Woo-Jin Kim

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sep 16, 2016
450 Md. 49 (Md. 2016)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Woo-Jin Kim

Case Details

Full title:Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner v. Woo-Jin Kim…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Date published: Sep 16, 2016

Citations

450 Md. 49 (Md. 2016)
146 A.3d 144