From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Seward

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Apr 2, 2014
89 A.3d 152 (Md. 2014)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 107 Sept. Term, 2013.

2014-04-2

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Jamie Blum SEWARD, Respondent.


ORDER

This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent, with Right to Apply for Reinstatement After Ninety (90) Days, filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16–772, it is this 2nd day of April, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jamie Blum Seward be, and she hereby is, indefinitely suspended, effective immediately, by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for reinstatement after ninety (90) days from the date this Order is entered, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jamie Blum Seward from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State pursuant to Maryland Rule 16–772(d).


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Seward

Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Apr 2, 2014
89 A.3d 152 (Md. 2014)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Seward

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Jamie Blum…

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Date published: Apr 2, 2014

Citations

89 A.3d 152 (Md. 2014)
437 Md. 609