From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shurberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland
May 6, 2003
822 A.2d 1211 (Md. 2003)

Opinion

Misc. Docket AG No. 18, September Term, 2002.

May 6, 2003.

Circuit Court for Montgomery County; Patrick L. Woodward, Judge.

Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and Fletcher P. Thompson, Asst. Bar counsel for Atty. Grievance Com'n of MD, for Petitioner.

Harry A. Suissa, Silver Springs, for Respondent.

BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, JJ.


ORDER


The Court having considered the petition for disciplinary action, Recommended findings of fact and conclusions of law, petitioner's exceptions and recommendations and the oral arguments of counsel, it is this 6th day of May, 2003.

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of Court concurring, that the charges filed against the respondent, Jonathan Seth Shurberg as set forth in the petition for disciplinary action be, and it is hereby DISMISSED. Costs to be paid by Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shurberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland
May 6, 2003
822 A.2d 1211 (Md. 2003)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Shurberg

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. JONATHAN SETH SHURBERG

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: May 6, 2003

Citations

822 A.2d 1211 (Md. 2003)
822 A.2d 1211