Upon reading respondent's affidavit sworn to January 5, 2024 and the responsive correspondence by AGC dated February 9, 2024 and May 7, 2024, we find that respondent has substantially met the requirements for reinstatement (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]); Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Sossner], 221 A.D.3d 1131, 1131 [3d Dept 2023]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stone], 195 A.D.3d 1226, 1228 [3d Dept 2021]). Accordingly, we grant respondent's motion for reinstatement.

Upon reading respondent’s affidavit sworn to January 5, 2024 and the responsive correspondence by AGC dated February 9, 2024 and May 7, 2024, we find that respondent has substantially met the requirements for reinstatement (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]); Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Sossner], 221 A.D.3d 1131, 1131, 197 N.Y.S.3d 622 [3d Dept. 2023]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stone], 195 A.D.3d 1226, 1228, 145 N.Y.S.3d 428 [3d Dept. 2021]). Accordingly, we grant respondent’s motion for reinstatement.

The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the motion and respondent has been heard in reply. Upon reading respondent's motion papers, supplemental filing of September 11, 2023 and the responsive correspondence by AGC dated August 31, 2023, we find that respondent has satisfactorily met the requirements for reinstatement (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]); Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Stone], 195 A.D.3d 1226, 1227–1228, 145 N.Y.S.3d 428 [3d Dept. 2021] ). Accordingly, we grant respondent's motion for reinstatement.

Any attorney seeking reinstatement from suspension must establish, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) that he or she has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) that he or she has the requisite character and fitness for the practice of law, and (3) that it would be in the public interest to reinstate the attorney to practice in New York (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Nenninger], 180 A.D.3d 1317, 1317-1318 [2020]; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Respondent's submission sufficiently demonstrates that she has made the required showing and is entitled to reinstatement (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stone], 195 A.D.3d 1226, 1228 [2021]; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Respondent has clearly established that she has complied with the order suspending her and has not utilized her New York law license during the period of her suspension (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Vatti], 195 A.D.3d 1231, 1232 [2021]).

Any attorney seeking reinstatement from suspension must establish, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) that he or she has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) that he or she has the requisite character and fitness for the practice of law, and (3) that it would be in the public interest to reinstate the attorney to practice in New York (seeMatter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Nenninger], 180 A.D.3d 1317, 1317–1318, 116 N.Y.S.3d 920 [2020] ; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Respondent's submission sufficiently demonstrates that she has made the required showing and is entitled to reinstatement (seeMatter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Stone], 195 A.D.3d 1226, 1228, 145 N.Y.S.3d 428 [2021] ; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Respondent has clearly established that she has complied with the order suspending her and has not utilized her New York law license during the period of her suspension (seeMatter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Vatti], 195 AD3d 1231, 1232, 145 N.Y.S.3d 433 [2021] ).

Any attorney seeking reinstatement from suspension must establish, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) that he or she has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) that he or she has the requisite character and fitness for the practice of law, and (3) that it would be in the public interest to reinstate the attorney to practice in New York (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Nenninger], 180 A.D.3d 1317, 1317-1318 [2020]; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Respondent's submission sufficiently demonstrates that she has made the required showing and is entitled to reinstatement (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Stone], 195 A.D.3d 1226, 1228 [2021]; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Respondent has clearly established that she has complied with the order suspending her and has not utilized her New York law license during the period of her suspension (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Vatti], 195 A.D.3d 1231, 1232 [2021]).