Respondent has cured his registration delinquency and, other than his current suspension from which he seeks reinstatement, he has a blemish-free disciplinary history (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Pastor], 194 A.D.3d 1307, 1309, 147 N.Y.S.3d 256 [2021] ). Further, respondent provides proof that he regularly completed his required annual ethics training for his prior public sector employment, thereby mitigating the need for further ethical retraining (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Lance], 192 A.D.3d 1321, 1323, 142 N.Y.S.3d 671 [2021] ; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Thompson], 185 A.D.3d 1379, 1381, 128 N.Y.S.3d 689 [2020] ; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a [Holtz], 185 A.D.3d at 1280, 126 N.Y.S.3d 592 ). We therefore grant respondent's request and proceed to the merits of his application.

Respondent has cured his registration delinquency and, other than his current suspension from which he seeks reinstatement, he has a blemish-free disciplinary history (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Pastor], 194 A.D.3d 1307, 1309 [2021]). Further, respondent provides proof that he regularly completed his required annual ethics training for his prior public sector employment, thereby mitigating the need for further ethical retraining (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Lance], 192 A.D.3d 1321, 1323 [2021]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Thompson], 185 A.D.3d 1379, 1381 [2020]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Holtz], 185 A.D.3d at 1280). We therefore grant respondent's request and proceed to the merits of his application.

Respondent has cured his registration delinquency and, other than his current suspension from which he seeks reinstatement, he has a blemish-free disciplinary history (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Pastor], 194 A.D.3d 1307, 1309 [2021]). Further, respondent provides proof that he regularly completed his required annual ethics training for his prior public sector employment, thereby mitigating the need for further ethical retraining (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Lance], 192 A.D.3d 1321, 1323 [2021]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Thompson], 185 A.D.3d 1379, 1381 [2020]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Holtz], 185 A.D.3d at 1280). We therefore grant respondent's request and proceed to the merits of his application.