From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the Third Judicial Dep't v. Jin (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2023
215 A.D.3d 1162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

PM–83–23

04-20-2023

In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; v. Hyewon Jin, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 5279039)

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department. Hyewon Jin, Seoul, South Korea, respondent pro se.


Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Hyewon Jin, Seoul, South Korea, respondent pro se.

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2022 order of this Court ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a , 208 A.D.3d 1421, 1432, 173 N.Y.S.3d 697 [3d Dept. 2022] ; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [ 22 NYCRR] § 806.16 ).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion affidavit with exhibits sworn to November 2, 2022 and the January 26, 2023 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Dong-Hee Suh] , 176 A.D.3d 1299, 1299, 107 N.Y.S.3d 724 [3d Dept. 2019] ), it is,

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the Third Judicial Dep't v. Jin (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2023
215 A.D.3d 1162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Attorney Grievance Comm. for the Third Judicial Dep't v. Jin (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-A.)

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A. Attorney…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 20, 2023

Citations

215 A.D.3d 1162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
215 A.D.3d 1162