From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney-General v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap
Dec 1, 1885
4 A. 394 (N.H. 1885)

Opinion

Decided December, 1885.

Barnard Barnard, for the plaintiff.

Sanborn Hardy, for the defendant.


INFORMATION in the nature of a quo warranto, alleging the relator's election to the office of prudential committee of a school-district, and the defendant's usurpation of the office, and praying a judgment of ouster. At the last term, the defendant signed and filed the following paper:

"Belknap ss. Supreme Court. June Law Term, 1885.

"Atty. Gen. v. Johnson.

"To prevent further controversy in the district, and for the promotion of harmony in the school work, I have resigned the office of prudential committee * * *, and make no further claim to hold said office."

Whereupon, the defendant moving to dismiss, and the plaintiff moving for judgment of ouster as on default, the question of the proper entry to be made, upon consideration of the facts of the case, was sent to the trial term, where it was found that there should be a judgment prohibiting the defendant from interfering with the office; and at this term such a judgment was rendered.

All concurred.


Summaries of

Attorney-General v. Johnson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap
Dec 1, 1885
4 A. 394 (N.H. 1885)
Case details for

Attorney-General v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ATTORNEY-GENERAL (ex rel. Robinson) v. JOHNSON

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Belknap

Date published: Dec 1, 1885

Citations

4 A. 394 (N.H. 1885)
63 N.H. 622

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

sed pending removal proceedings ( Roberts v. Paul, Judge, 50 W. Va. 528; The State ex rel. Sanders v.…

In re Peoples

But where the statute imposes sanctions in addition to ouster, the proceeding may be prosecuted to its…