From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attica v. Brittain

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 31, 2024
Civil Action 22-1273 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-1273

01-31-2024

HENRY ATTICA v. KATHY BRITTAIN, ET AL.


ORDER

JOHN R. PADOVA, JUDGE

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2024, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition FOR Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Counseled and Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Supplement to the Counseled and Amended Petition (collectively “the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus”) (Docket Nos. 1, 18, 21), and all attendant and responsive briefing, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, to which no objections have been made, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

On January 5, 2024, counsel for respondents filed a letter in which he explicitly stated that “[t]he Commonwealth has thoroughly reviewed Judge Wells's recommendations and has no objections to the R&R.” (Docket No. 33.)

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED as to Petitioner's third claim, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to present three favorable witnesses at trial.

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED as to Petitioner's first claim, that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor's evidentiary misstatements during closing argument, and his second claim, that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present testimony from Jeffrey T. Morrill, a fire science expert. However, we find that reasonable jurists could disagree about whether trial counsel was ineffective in connection with both of these claims and we GRANT a certificate of appealability with respect to Petitioner's first and second claims for relief.

4. Petitioner's fourth and fifth claims are procedurally defaulted and these claims are, therefore, DISMISSED. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability with respect to Petitioner's fourth and fifth claims.

5. Petitioner's convictions for conspiracy, arson, and risking a catastrophe are VACATED.

6. Within 180 days of the date of this Order, the Commonwealth shall RETRY Petitioner or release him from custody.


Summaries of

Attica v. Brittain

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 31, 2024
Civil Action 22-1273 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Attica v. Brittain

Case Details

Full title:HENRY ATTICA v. KATHY BRITTAIN, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-1273 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2024)