From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Atteberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Apr 21, 2020
598 S.W.3d 217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107899

04-21-2020

Jimmy D. ATTEBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Tyler P. Coyle, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant. Kristen S. Johnson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Tyler P. Coyle, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203, for appellant.

Kristen S. Johnson, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before James M. Dowd, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Robin Ransom, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jimmy D. Atteberry ("Movant") appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion Mo. R. Crim. P. 29.15 (2019). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2019).


Summaries of

Atteberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Apr 21, 2020
598 S.W.3d 217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Atteberry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jimmy D. ATTEBERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Apr 21, 2020

Citations

598 S.W.3d 217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)